nowadays, there's almost no reason for anything less than lossless for audio.
more and more players support flac, and flash storage is cheap.
I use it whenever possible. its probably placebo thing or ocd compared to 320kbps but meh
nowadays, there's almost no reason for anything less than lossless for audio.
more and more players support flac, and flash storage is cheap.
I use it whenever possible. its probably placebo thing or ocd compared to 320kbps but meh
a victim of software counterfeiting
FLAC (44.1 kHz/16-bit) or FLAC 24Bit (Hi-Res)
Flac!![]()
320kbps, not that I could tell it's different anyway.![]()
MP3 320 is a bad codec and very out dated... for audiophiles only flac will do
FLAC, MP3 320 CBR, or MP3 VBR V0. Depends what is available.
mp3 is so yesterday
and if you are still after mp3s vbr v0 is more efficient that cbr 320kbps and there's virtually no difference in audio quality
Even after 25 years, MP3 will remain the top lossy audio format.
I've realized this after quite some time, but I find that V0 isn't always available on the trackers I can access. I don't go out of my way to hunt down V0, since I'm not too concerned about storage space.
320 for regular everyday listening
FLAC for my favourite music