level of ScienceHD, TheGeeks can be increased as they are great as content wise. Also I have not seen many invite GA for those as compared to ipt.

Don't worry JohnKarter, the levels has been not updated since very long time. I've seen this rand few years ago and FSC, FTN and FSC was also on top. Since this time lot of things has changed and no one updated it.

Originally Posted by HighScore

Don't worry JohnKarter, the levels has been not updated since very long time. I've seen this rand few years ago and FSC, FTN and FSC was also on top. Since this time lot of things has changed and no one updated it.

Not true. We constantly keep an eye on the list. We also decide based on the trackers worth, user requests, content etc. and not only rarity

TSH should be level 6

Just my two cents: TSH should be Level 6 (awesome rules), FL, nCORE, TD and iPT should be at least level 6 (great content, awesome speeds).Rutracker should be at least level 5 (amazing content). SceneHD, GFT and FSC should be level 3 or even lower (too many strict rules for a poor content delivered with a fast pretime and fast speeds for the first couple of hours). Also, HD-MKV, HD-Bits.ro and BluEvo should be at least level 3 (autobot for 0day releases, internal encoders, a fair amount of daily releases).

According to the OP this "level discussion" thread is about how difficult it is to join a tracker. We should create different tops for content, rules, staff etc.

Originally Posted by srn

According to the OP this "level discussion" thread is about how difficult it is to join a tracker. We should create different tops for content, rules, staff etc.

yeah that what I'm talking about hole level thing is about rarity shit not content

Originally Posted by Red Lion

yeah that what I'm talking about hole level thing is about rarity shit not content

Not really, it's about the most wanted trackers, trackers with kick-ass content and rare torrents, etc. like Pedro's, HDbits, CHDbits, DB9, PTP, BTN, What.cd, trackers where you find everything you need from perfect flacs(take what.cd for example, I found there some albums ripped in extraordinary quality I couldn't find elsewhere) to full untouched blurays(like CHD and HDbits that have the best encoding team I ever saw), those are the trackers that deserve a high level. Nobody gives a damn about FSC, FTN, iTS, SceneHD, GFT besides collecting them, hell...you probably will never use those, you'll only be proud that you have high levels, all the content on these so-called high level trackers you'll find it anywhere else, even on public trackers. I didn't find yet another reason to hunt trackers like these besides the fact it's hard to get into..

Basically, yes... It's all about the content, or why the hell do you need a tracker for?

Sent from Tapatalk

totally right you are Tex... this is the DAMN TRUE!

Originally Posted by Tex

It's all about the content, or why the hell do you need a tracker for?

It's all about personal content needs and content variation plus ease of usability versus content offer, rarity, pretime, level or whatever suits better in the ranking system, which ranges from individual to individual, different criterias, de gustibus non disputandum.My point is, you don't need a level 10 tracker to watch decent HD content.