Originally Posted by TheTrader

btw the fact that Waffles was a little bit easier to seed, doesn't mean that waffles was a better tracker. Waffles was up and running for so many years and they just had 300.000 torrents or so and Apollo opened a couple of months ago and already has 620.000 torrents (at the time of writing). So yes, Apollo is a WAY better music tracker!

Last but not least, did you ever read their rules and their ratio requirements? They are not strict at all. They require ratio 0 up to 0.6 (depending on each user's downloaded data) so surviving there is not as hard as you describe. On the contrary, i would say it's fairly easy to survive on Apollo:

Just my two cents

Same principle you said about seed difficulty doesnt make tracker bad, applies for number of torrents - you cannot say the tracker is better because it has more torrents. Waffles had 300 000 meaningful torrents. Apollo has maybe 2 times more torrents, but... 90% of that is stuff which almost nobody is looking for, and many versions of same title (flac/24bitflac/mp3). I did some searches and still think waffles was better contentwise overally.

Anyway, I don't wish to argue with you guys about that, if you love it, you love it I really hope it will improve by time, because those fallen are being missed...