I thınk Fux0r will be level 7
Pre Times= 8
Speed= 8
Content= 10

I disagree, BTN & PTP Invites are very hard and expensive to come by nowadays and yes should be Level 7. The only tracker I have found impossible to get an Invite over the years has to be DB9!, Man that tracker is so hard to come by and coming from a big DnB fan it should not be?. It should be Level 10 without a doubt and higher than HDBits.org. I am in HDBits but not DB9, so is that not an obvious answer? FSC is like a yuck tracker, it relies on like iTS its community but lets face facts who uses trackers for community, if I wanted community I would just use a general forum on the net!, should be level 3 its cack!!!.

Originally Posted by Raver

I disagree, BTN & PTP Invites are very hard and expensive to come by nowadays and yes should be Level 7. The only tracker I have found impossible to get an Invite over the years has to be DB9!, Man that tracker is so hard to come by and coming from a big DnB fan it should not be?. It should be Level 10 without a doubt and higher than HDBits.org. I am in HDBits but not DB9, so is that not an obvious answer? FSC is like a yuck tracker, it relies on like iTS its community but lets face facts who uses trackers for community, if I wanted community I would just use a general forum on the net!, should be level 3 its cack!!!.

Yes, DB9 should be level 10, no doubt. HDBits invites are hard to get but not impossible. They have invite forums on some trackers. But for DB9 invite are almost impossible.
Also AOM is again rare or you can say impossible to get into tracker and should be above HDBits. Although you got luckily someone kind enough to invite you, you have to prove that you are a worthy magician by providing proofs like youtube vids or something like that.

Also can I say x264.me is no way tracker level 4!. I'm sorry but that should be way up with level 7. x264 (7) is a really hard tracker to get an invite. Just a thought @staff. FTN (7) level 6, not sure about that one either, at least level 7 I would say. Fuxor (4) level 6, not either should be down a couple of notches to level 4. NextGen (5), Piratethenet (6) iTS (7) and PixelHD (5) should be higher, level 5. Cinematic (4), Tehconnection (4), Cinemageddon (4) all should be a notch higher, level 4. BitHDtv (3) should be level 3. WHAT, CosaNostra (6) level 2, no way should be way up to at least level 6. Gettorrents.org (3) is now shut for good and should move up to level 3. I think that's it. have a think @staff

According to the OP the level is based on how difficult it is to join a tracker. Others have said that the top should be based on the content found on the trackers, number of peers, speeds etc. I think we need 2 tops because this one is a mess (a combination of both).

Exactly. So why x264.me level 4 and others I have mentioned. All those trackers I have mentioned are really difficult to get invites etc..

Originally Posted by Raver

Exactly. So why x264.me level 4 and others I have mentioned. All those trackers I have mentioned are really difficult to get invites etc..

That's correct. This top should be updated accordingly: rarity level.

On the tracker list,the number of torrents of the tracker ABTorrents is only 16.

I think we should create two separate tracker level list considering content and invite rarity. There are many trackers which are rich with content but are underrated just because their invites are easily available.

That's 100% true,many great trackers are under estimated because their invites are available everywhere in spite of their huge content and super fast speed
ex:ipt,file list&torrentday