hey Everyone

Which Trackers you think are Over Rated Although it's Listed as high Rank Trackers (From 7 to 10).

and Which Trackers that you think are under Rated Although it's Listed as Mid-Low Rank Trackers (From 6 to 2).

as we all Know The Rank is a Measurement for Private Trackers only which based on:

No.	Rank Formula object	scale
1	Content (old + new + rarity + alive torrents numbers)	50%
2	invites Rarity	10%
3	Speed
4	PreTime (Scene or P2p).
5	Age of the Tracker.
6	Numbers of active Seeders and Leechers.
7	Community and Active Members
8	Uploaders (internal+ uploaders activity).
9	Torrents Age.
10	Staff and Rules (how easy to seed/build Ratio/ seed Requirement
11	Popularity of the tracker
12	Fulfilling requests in request section.
13	Torrent Retention (for how long time the uploader and seeders tend to keep the torrent alive).

for me i think TorrentLeech should be 6 not 7 Due to invites Spread every where + high Seeding requirement time. While there are better trackers are ranked 6 which are ratioless or have no seed time requirement with very good content)

also Filelist should demoted to 6 due it's content and very low number of uploaded torrents per day the last months.

nCore should be 8 due to Content (old and new) + amazing speed + RatioLess + Pretime + invites rarity + huge active Peers numbers .

TV-Vault should go higher to 7 rank not 6 Due to the most old TV content Library + invites rarity + very rare content.

CinemaZ should go to 6 Due to Special Content and focusing on Non-MainStream Content regardless the ability to buy invites

that's my personal opinion, so what's yours

PS. the Rank Measurement above is based on personal experience and maybe some members disagree with some points .

** Note:i meant by PreTime for P2p "how fast the internal uploader upload the new materials (a movie/tv/music) before other trackers" and yes there's not a pretime for P2p releases but i didn't find a more precise term actually .

Trackers's ranking List https://torrentinvites.org/trackerlist.php