Torrent Invites! Buy, Trade, Sell Or Find Free Invites, For EVERY Private Tracker! HDBits.org, BTN, PTP, MTV, Empornium, Orpheus, Bibliotik, RED, IPT, TL, PHD etc!



Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Power User starrdust's Avatar
    Reputation Points
    1
    Reputation Power
    0
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    50,399
    Time Online
    307 d 6 h 45 m
    Avg. Time Online
    2 h 59 m
    Mentioned
    1206 Post(s)
    Quoted
    637 Post(s)
    Liked
    10207 times
    Feedbacks
    167 (100%)

    Apple FaceTime car crash lawsuit dismissed

    A lawsuit blaming Apple for a child's death in a car crash, has been dismissed by a US appeals court in California.

    Garrett Wilhelm told police he was using FaceTime on the iPhone 6 when he crashed into the back of a family car.

    Five-year-old Moriah Modisette died from the injuries she sustained in the 2014 Christmas Eve accident in Texas.

    Her family held Apple responsible for not enabling "lockout" technology on the phone.

    Severe damage
    The car was so badly damaged that Moriah and her father James had to be extracted from it, both in a critical condition.

    Moriah later died of her injuries in a local children's hospital.

    Police found Mr Wilhelm's intact phone still running the FaceTime application after the accident.

    The Modisette family alleged Apple was responsible for the accident as it had considered utilising technology to detect motion on its phones and disable certain functions when driving.

    Apple had patented this technology but it was not included on the iPhone 6.

    The lawsuit states Apple's iPhone 6 was "defective" and shouldn't have been shipped without the lock-out feature.

    It said Apple should pay damages for its "wrongful failure to install and implement the safer, alternative design for which it sought a patent in December 2008".

    Apple was granted the patent in April 2014 by the US patent office.

    No "duty of care"
    In May, a court had dismissed the case, leading to the appeal.

    The appeals court agreed with the earlier decision, concluding Apple "did not owe the Modisettes a duty of care".

    It said it was not up to the tech giant to take responsibility for actions of individuals using its applications.

    The ruling determined the Modisettes "cannot establish that Apple's design of the iPhone constituted a proximate cause of the injuries they suffered".

  2. #2
    Donor
    W3bhunt3r's Avatar
    Reputation Points
    10945
    Reputation Power
    100
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    160
    Time Online
    47 d 11 h 23 m
    Avg. Time Online
    26 m
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Quoted
    30 Post(s)
    Liked
    84 times
    Feedbacks
    9 (100%)
    The first common sense story i have read in a very long time!

    Everyone wants to blame anyone else for THEIR actions.


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •