Printable View
hey all,im new to private trackers and im just wondering why hdbits.org is soooo hard to get into and so popular,everyone wants an invite!.also theres many other sites with way more torrents then them but im assuming there qualitys better.do they get film releases quicker etc? hope this isnt a stupid question i just see people going mad for an invite and id like to know why :P
They definitely do not release films quicker. In fact they are the last to release a movie. Just take a look at its review and see for yourself if it's worth the hassle. This torrent site is very overrated in my opinion.
ooo whats ur personal opinion on the best movie site that gets the earliest releases?Quote:
Originally Posted by srn
If you are looking for trackers that get s the early release try Sceneaccess for scene material/ also PublicHD has some good pretimes , but all the movies you will eventualy get from Iptorrents and torrentleech few minutes after they are released.
I agree with redstar. Torrentleech is good but Sceneaccess has better pre-timings.
In terms of availability, CHDBits is also good. You can find a lot of movies there, too.
HDBits.org is more about the highest encoding quality possible rather than pretime.You will find the most reputable P2P encodes there, but, as they say, pretime will be null because they are not scene, they do not work like that.And in a long term, at least 25% of the main popular stuff on their site will always be leaked in public (PublicHD) one way or another, so if you're one of many searching only new popular stuff, you can find it publicly.But, on the other hand, if you like classic or rare films in the highest quality possible, then HDBits.org is a place where you'll find them.
It's the Holy Grail of trackers and as I know they prefer quality over quantity. It's a shame 'though that most of p2p users wait for the first Bluray release of a movie/tv show and watch it. The 2nd thing that motivates its popularity is that joining this tracker is very hard.Quote:
Originally Posted by DonCorleoneTI
i think WEB-DL from itunes are released by hdbits,, also there encoder team are very good... thats why popular
Even though for some it might be a holy grail, you do have to agree that there are also awesome alternatives from the honorable competition, such as BeyondHD, for example.
oooo im hoping to get into ptp but the chances of that are slim,also i dont like the design of hdbits its a shame.sounds like its more about wanting what you carnt have aka an invite :P
hdbits.org is about quality, if you care about quality, then go for it ;)
Actually BTN is faster and better than hdbits when it comes for TV series.Quote:
Originally Posted by touseefiqbal
Quote:
Originally Posted by srn
NTb is internal in both sites.Unlike HDB, BTN lacks peers, from what i'm hearing (i'm not a member there and i don't want to be)
There are some peers but it's ratioless, while maintaining a good ratio in hdbits is not a walk in the park.Quote:
Originally Posted by DonCorleoneTI
LOL. I like thatQuote:
Originally Posted by srn
I can fairly say that the hardest ratio to maintain for me was at what.cd.Even so, back then when i was a member, i had ratio inf with a reasonable buffer, that's because i downloaded only freeleech and i was lucky enough to have a box during the last year's global freeleech.I don't think that maintaining a good ratio @ HDBits is harder than @ what.cd.With just a seedbox, grabbing only internal encodes such as popular stuff from 2013-2014 rated 7 and above @ IMDB should build you a nice buffer, even if it's capped at 5x ratio per torrent by their new rules.Of course, if you want to download different things, it may be quite difficult to maintain a good ratio, but if you grab only popular stuff, everything should be fine. ;)