Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookmaker
Although the evidence I submitted in the application was so solid and reputable evidence, unfortunately it was called insufficient evidence, I think the site administrators do not know what they want, they should not keep a place in the forum.
My application had good statistics, yet I was rejected. This process makes it seem like applying to this site is a waste of time.
I don't understand what these sites are looking for as proof?
I have proof of seed and that I don't have h&r and it can be seen when I am registered, everything is generally visible.
What is their proof?
You can try to contact them via the application form using another email ("None" has all the urls/proof ask), and the questions in "about" not forgetting to give the name of the original account.Quote:
Originally Posted by bookmaker
I did this for another tracker
What are they looking for in evidence?
I sent 3 screenshots from the tracker showing my seed ratio activity that I don't have h&r and they always rejected me. What am I filling in wrong?