What are the most Over Rated and Under Rated Trackers

Printable View

hey Everyone :five:

Which Trackers you think are Over Rated :bebored: Although it's Listed as high Rank Trackers (From 7 to 10).

and Which Trackers that you think are under Rated Although it's Listed as Mid-Low Rank Trackers (From 6 to 2).

as we all Know The Rank is a Measurement for Private Trackers only which based on:

No. :star: Rank Formula object :star: scale

1 Content (old + new + rarity + alive torrents numbers) 50%

2 invites Rarity 10%

3 Speed

4 PreTime (Scene or P2p).

5 Age of the Tracker.

6 Numbers of active Seeders and Leechers.

7 Community and Active Members

8 Uploaders (internal+ uploaders activity).

9 Torrents Age.

10 Staff and Rules (how easy to seed/build Ratio/ seed Requirement

11 Popularity of the tracker

12 Fulfilling requests in request section.

13 Torrent Retention (for how long time the uploader and seeders tend to keep the torrent alive).

for me i think TorrentLeech should be 6 not 7 Due to invites Spread every where + high Seeding requirement time. While there are better trackers are ranked 6 which are ratioless or have no seed time requirement with very good content)

also Filelist should demoted to 6 due it's content and very low number of uploaded torrents per day the last months.

nCore should be 8 due to Content (old and new) + amazing speed + RatioLess + Pretime + invites rarity + huge active Peers numbers .

TV-Vault should go higher to 7 rank not 6 Due to the most old TV content Library + invites rarity + very rare content.

CinemaZ should go to 6 Due to Special Content and focusing on Non-MainStream Content regardless the ability to buy invites

that's my personal opinion, so what's yours :hmmmm:

PS. the Rank Measurement above is based on personal experience and maybe some members disagree with some points :coffee:.

** Note:i meant by PreTime for P2p "how fast the internal uploader upload the new materials (a movie/tv/music) before other trackers" and yes there's not a pretime for P2p releases but i didn't find a more precise term actually :).

Trackers's ranking List https://torrentinvites.org/trackerlist.php

03-07-2025
KokoVANCO

Hey BRO, i hope alot of members participate in this topic, personally i have only 4 tracker TL/IPT/AP2P/HEBITS, So i have no ability to make judgements, arabp2p its good for arabic content, hbts for local tv, tl and ipt are great.
I miss old days when i had a wider collection, some of them where with great content and speed, SCC i miss archive, REVTT for pretimes, PTN and Cosanostra i miss movies content, TT and waffles for music, BITME for education, bcg and bitgamer for games.
03-07-2025
bucknaked

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldTrader

hey Everyone :five:

Which Trackers you think are Over Rated :bebored: Although it's Listed as high Rank Trackers (From 7 to 10).

and Which Trackers that you think are under Rated Although it's Listed as Mid-Low Rank Trackers (From 6 to 2).

as we all Know The Rank is a Measurement for Private Trackers only which based on:

1- Content (old + new + rarity + alive torrents numbers). 2- invites Rarity. 3- Speed. 4- PreTime. 5- Age of the Tracker.

6- Numbers of Seeders and Leechers. 7- Community and Active Members. 8- Uploaders (internal+ uploaders activity) .

9- Torrents Age (how many years) . 10- Staff and Rules. 11- Popularity of the tracker. 12- Fulfilling requests in request section.

13- Torrent Retention (for how long time the uploader and seeders tend to keep the torrent alive).

for me i think TorrentLeech should be 6 not 7 Due to invites Spread every where + high Seeding requirement time. While there are better trackers are ranked 6 which are ratioless or have no seed time requirement with very good content)

also Filelist should demoted to 6 due it's content and very low number of uploaded torrents per day the last months.

nCore should be 8 due to Content (old and new) + amazing speed + Pretime + invites rarity + huge active Peers numbers + RatioLess .

TV-Vault should go higher to 7 rank not 6 Due to the most old TV content Library + invites rarity + very rare content.

CinemaZ should go to 6 Due to Special Content and focusing on Non-MainStream Content regardless the ability to buy invites

that's my personal opinion, so what's yours :hmmmm:

PS. the Rank Measurement above is based on personal experience and maybe some members disagree with some points :coffee:.

Trackers's ranking List https://torrentinvites.org/trackerlist.php

What people don't understand about Filelist is that most of the content is quality coming directly from BTN/PTP/HDB, they care about quality not quantity. That's what's so special about FL, plus their internal PlayHD, PlayWEB PlayBD which offers exclusivity to the content. Their level should be higher.

I agree with nCore it is a tracker that deserves more.
03-07-2025
oldTrader

Quote:

Originally Posted by bucknaked

What people don't understand about Filelist is that most of the content is quality coming directly from BTN/PTP/HDB, they care about quality not quantity. That's what's so special about FL, plus their internal PlayHD, PlayWEB PlayBD which offers exclusivity to the content. Their level should be higher.

I agree with nCore it is a tracker that deserves more.

thanks bro for adding that point about Filelist although they need more improvement :thumbs_up:
i think we should talk with TheTrader and Yokel about Elevating nCore to level 8
03-16-2025
KokoVANCO

UPDATE:
after a week of using NCORE i believe its one of best general trackers out there with content and speed, its should be upgraded like you proposed.
But i disagree with your opinion about TL and FL there are gold man.
03-16-2025
SaToRu

TL and FL are so under rated trackers.
03-16-2025
oldTrader

Quote:

Originally Posted by KokoVANCO

UPDATE:
after a week of using NCORE i believe its one of best general trackers out there with content and speed, its should be upgraded like you proposed.
But i disagree with your opinion about TL and FL there are gold man.

sure nCore is my #1 Tracker with Torrentday for general
i would say FL lost a lot of it's steam but let's hope get back their great days .:creep:
03-16-2025
oldTrader

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaToRu

TL and FL are so under rated trackers.

hey SaToRu
i disagree but let's agree to disagree :listen:
TL invites everywhere and as we know rarity is a part of rank measurement
we can't put amazing tracker like nCore with same level 7 as TL
also FL is less than Bithumen which is bigger and has faster Pretimes but ranked 6 not 7
03-16-2025
SaToRu

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldTrader

hey SaToRu
i disagree but let's agree to disagree :listen:
TL invites everywhere and as we know rarity is a part of rank measurement
we can't put amazing tracker like nCore with same level 7 as TL
also FL is less than Bithumen which is bigger and has faster Pretimes but ranked 6 not 7

Maybe you're right about TL invites. But i think they are doing that to get more members for VIP donations and like this to pay the server cost and so on. On the other hand, I'm sure that TL has the most content (including variety of quality), seeders, fastest and pre-times.
About FL, i totally agree with (bucknaked), though for me FL has a perfect content library and speed.
03-20-2025
oldTrader

ok i improved the post and added a table to make it more clear

about the scale it means the importance of he object and i think 50% for the content and 10% for invites rarity is reasonable. :stupido:

i would appreciate any ideas about the scale

No.	:star: Rank Formula object :star:	scale
1	Content (old + new + rarity + alive torrents numbers)	50%
2	invites Rarity	10%
3	Speed
4	PreTime (Scene or P2p).
5	Age of the Tracker.
6	Numbers of active Seeders and Leechers.
7	Community and Active Members
8	Uploaders (internal+ uploaders activity).
9	Torrents Age.
10	Staff and Rules (how easy to seed/build Ratio/ seed Requirement
11	Popularity of the tracker
12	Fulfilling requests in request section.
13	Torrent Retention (for how long time the uploader and seeders tend to keep the torrent alive).