Torrent Invites! Buy, Trade, Sell Or Find Free Invites, For EVERY Private Tracker! HDBits.org, BTN, PTP, MTV, Empornium, Orpheus, Bibliotik, RED, IPT, TL, PHD etc!



Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    D'oh!
    heytterebea's Avatar
    Reputation Points
    6839
    Reputation Power
    100
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    746
    Time Online
    13 d 4 h 56 m
    Avg. Time Online
    5 m
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Quoted
    77 Post(s)
    Liked
    490 times
    Feedbacks
    43 (100%)

    FCC: Trust Us, We'll Protect an Open Internet

    As the FCC prepared new rules that could allow Internet service providers to give preferential treatment to digital content of their choosing, the commission's chairman said Thursday that he had no intention of reversing existing policy, denying reports that the principles of net neutrality would be gutted.

    The FCC's proposal would potentially allow Internet service providers (ISPs) like Comcast or Verizon to negotiate with online content providers like Netflix, Amazon or Hulu, and charge them for faster delivery of their content to U.S. consumers. As word spread about the proposal on Wednesday, critics viewed it as a reversal of the FCC's Open Internet rules, which are supposed to bar ISPs from discriminating against Internet traffic.

    But FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler denied those accusations on Thursday, writing in a blog post that "behavior harmful to consumers or competition by limiting the openness of the Internet will not be permitted." Wheeler added that the new rules are in accordance with a D.C. Court of Appeals ruling from January that struck down some parts of the FCC's 2010 Open Internet Order.

    The new rules, Wheeler wrote, would mandate three main things: ISPs must be transparent about their business agreements, ISPs cannot block any legal content, and ISPs "may not act in a commercially unreasonable manner to harm the Internet, including favoring the traffic from an affiliated entity."

    Even so, Wheeler's statement doesn't seem to contradict Mashable's earlier assessment that the new rules could allow ISPs to charge fees for preferential treatment. An FCC official said the new rules would not enact "a flat ban" on such deals, and would comply with the D.C. Court of Appeals' request that the FCC look at business agreements on a case-by-case basis.

    Wheeler, a former cable industry lobbyist, wrote that the proposed rules would set a high bar for what is "commercially reasonable," but it's unclear at this point what that means and how much leeway ISPs would have to charge content providers.

    The proposed rules are being circulated among FCC commissioners on Thursday. The FCC, however, won't vote on the final rules until May 15. At that point a public comment period will open, and at the end of it the FCC will write the final rules and vote on them. Wheeler said he wants to have the new rules in place by the end of the year.

  2. #2
    Power User josephs8's Avatar
    Reputation Points
    31
    Reputation Power
    39
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    170
    Time Online
    4 d 17 h 15 m
    Avg. Time Online
    1 m
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)
    Liked
    15 times
    Feedbacks
    0
    Yeah Im sure they protect us, until there wallet gets a little fuller.


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •