Hey!

What Is The Hardest Tracker To Seed?

I'd like to say its What.cd, db9 abd bitmetv. hard as hell.

What.cd for me.

what and bitmetv

Bibliotik is pretty difficult to get a good ratio on if you don't upload things yourself. And waffles for some reason has been giving me problems as well

it would be bitmetv, even though waffles was hard to seed as well but managed to get a good ratio.

Guys,i think there is a difference between seeding and building a decent ratio.

For example i managed to build a good ratio on Waffles and Bibliotik only by uploading my own torrents

But these trackers share the fact that almost everything i upload is shared and is never left unleeched!!!

As a conclusion i think that the most difficult tracker to seed is by far What.cd

Originally Posted by Tony Stark

Guys,i think there is a difference between seeding and building a decent ratio.

For example i managed to build a good ratio on Waffles and Bibliotik only by uploading my own torrents

But these trackers share the fact that almost everything i upload is shared and is never left unleeched!!!

As a conclusion i think that the most difficult tracker to seed is by far What.cd

I haven't got What.cd but my waffles torrents are pretty much well seeded, almost all of them to at least 1:1 and more. And I don't think that What.cd is any difference in fact what.cd has more enabled users than waffles, which means more leechers, the good to get your torrents seeded.

LiLTurk my friend i know well what i'm saying

What.cd is extremelly different from Waffles.Since im an uploader on both of them i can tell you for sure that there is a big amount of torrents there (What.cd) that are never leeched by anyone!!!

So Waffles is easier to seed and to build a good ratio

waffles

What.cd and Bibliotik were the hardest trackers I could ever maintain a decent ratio. Uploading is the best chance to increase your ratio there, only seeding on new torrents will get you nothing.

Sent from Tapatalk