I agree that CHDbits is easy to find and cheap but we cant underestimate that most of the torrents on CHDbits are came from HDbits and if HDbits would have not there then CHDbits would have nothing ..lolzz
I agree that CHDbits is easy to find and cheap but we cant underestimate that most of the torrents on CHDbits are came from HDbits and if HDbits would have not there then CHDbits would have nothing ..lolzz
CHD is okay, encodes are excellent and spread fast. Speeds are great and swarms are huge, indeed it's a very valuable tracker for me.
HDBits, well.. I'm not on this tracker. But I know for a fact that their internals can also be found on other trackers as well as on usenet. As far as I know, it's the internals that are what make this tracker valuable.
B2S is a real HD tracker like AHD & HD-T for example, offering full bluray iso's, remuxes, etc. But I simply couldn't enjoy it the way that I wanted to. I don't read Korean, I don't like having to interpret inaccurate language translation from software, and then the damn tracker wouldn't whitelist my preferred client.
In my early days searching for the perfect HD tracker, HD encodes in containers pushing the smallest size at the highest quality were the only criteria I used when deciding what was saved on my hard drives. But hard drive space is fucking dirt cheap nowadays. As far as content is concerned, all HD trackers are basically the same. My advise would be to collect as many as you can and use them all in conjunction with one another, this way you can find any movie, in whatever format, and target size.
Personally, when I when I judge or rate a tracker whether it be movies, HD, music, pr0n, or whatever, I'm more attracted to a tracker's code base, the intuitiveness of it's search function, & the overall browsing experience I get.
CHD because has more users and torrents
CHD imo. I'm not a member of HDBits, but I did some searching...
Users:
CHDbits:43000
HDbits:20000
Torrents:
CHD: 46000 (alive torrents)
HDBits: 58000 (total torrents; the number of alive torrents are unknown)
HDBits definitely wins because they have considerably more torrents and therefore more content. Also, some of CHDBit's torrents are Chinese so we english users have no use for them.
Internal Encoders:
CHDbits wins by far. CHD has faster releases (from what I've heard, you have to wait a month for HDBits' internals). CHD even beats the Scene sometimes. You often see CHD's encodes at other trackers, and they are often downloaded a lot. The same cannot be said for HDBits encodes.
Forums:
HDBits if you speak english. CHDbits if you speak Chinese. Few people are Chinese here, so HDBits wins.
Ratio:
CHD wins. Tons of freeleech, and not just crappy releases that people download for upload; many of the most desired torrents are freeleech.
Rarity:
HDbits obviously. Level 10 vs Level 7 is a huge difference. HDbits is great for epeen.
while we are at it ...What about hdchina ?
HDChina is a fine HD tracker as well, full of DIY, remuxes, internal HD encodes,and even untouched iso's with included subs. As an Asian myself, I benefit from all Chinese HD trackers. HDChina, like all other Chinese trackers guarantee huge swarms, ease of availability, and ton's of seeding potential. I pick CHD if you had to choose just one, but for the hell of it I'd get 'em all! Though HD Road has a minimum leeching requirement of 4GB down per month, if you move as much data as I do it's cake!
I think CHDbit have more seeds and therefore it's faster!
CHDBits is doing great in getting fast releases in Bluray earlier than scene. but only problem is their slow speed. its like their fast bluray torrents gets fully seeded after scene releases so people stick with most of scene releases. but ATM i would voite for CHDBits. great tracker.
Last edited by Tex; 03-12-2014 at 04:26 PM.
Take a look at my request and help with any information.
How to submit a feedback | Check my Feedbacks | PM Tex